Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 4049 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon W3520 - 171 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €114.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |