Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2934 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon W3520 - 239 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
413
38.670411985018724%
Multi-Core
1395
30.471821756225424%
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
