Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon W-2125 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 1954 days newer than Xeon W-2125.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Xeon W-2125 - 80 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 55 vs 120 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
