Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon Platinum 8180 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 2339 days newer than Xeon Platinum 8180.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS - 56 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Xeon Platinum 8180 - 134 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 - 28 vs 205 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon Platinum 8180
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Platinum 8180
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1320
53.31179321486268%
Multi-Core
11044
100%
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon Platinum | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
28 | Cores | 8 |
56 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 205 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
