Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 3670 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 13% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5645 - 250 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-10750H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i7-10750H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
