Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 4074 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5620 - 140 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
