Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 39% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5620 - 150 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
