Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1934 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 80 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5620 - 142 vs 121 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
