Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3692 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5620 - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |