Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 952 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Xeon E5620 - 154 vs 151 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |