Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 127 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 170 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 85% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $169.73 vs $1166.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.13 vs $7.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 140 vs 145 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.62/FPS
14.829396325459316%
Price, €
€1295.31
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39241 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
98.23529411764706%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
92.59574468085107%
Multi-Core
3898
40.52396298991579%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |