Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1603 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $168.17 vs $1166.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |