Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10940X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10940X is 1089 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 145 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10940X - 44 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 137 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $493.56 vs $1166.95
- Up to 59% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $4.0 vs $9.74 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
133
97.08029197080292%
Value, €/FPS
€9.74/FPS
41.067761806981515%
Price, €
€1295.31
42%
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1812 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€547.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €547.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
75.22407170294494%
Multi-Core
9619
89.32119973999443%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 14 |
44 | Threads | 28 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |