Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1371 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 44 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 281 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $190.11 vs $1166.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing F1 22 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.75 vs $4.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9407 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 10 |
44 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |