Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-10700K

Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Core i7-10700K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4

2.4 GHz | 22-core

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)

Buy for 1,295.31 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77053 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700K

3.8 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)

Buy for 191.54 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77054 minutes ago

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4

2.4 GHz | 22-core

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)

Buy for 1,295.31 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77053 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700K

3.8 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)

Buy for 191.54 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77054 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1283 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 44 vs 16 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K

  • Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 118 vs 109 FPS
  • Up to 85% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $172.56 vs $1166.95
  • Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Alan Wake 2.
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016


FPS

109

92.37288135593221%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€1295.31

14%

Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)

Buy for 1,295.31 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77053 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Core i7-10700K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

118

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€191.54

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)

Buy for 191.54 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 77054 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Core i7-10700K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016


Single-Core

1175

68.87456037514654%

Multi-Core

9619

100%

Intel Core i7-10700K Logo
Core i7-10700K

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1706

100%

Multi-Core

8142

84.64497348996777%

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4

vs
Intel Core i7-10700K Logo

Intel Core i7-10700K

Oct 25th, 2016Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5CollectionCore i7
BroadwellCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 2011-3SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
22
Cores8
44
Threads16
2.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.1 GHz
145 WTDP
125 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
24.0xMultiplier
38.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.