Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1150 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4330 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76882 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
90.72340425531915%
Multi-Core
2144
22.28921925356066%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4330 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |