Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-4160 - 72 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 84% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $185.81 vs $1166.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $2.95 vs $17.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
72
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.99/FPS
16.397998888271264%
Price, €
€1295.31
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36574 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
70
97.22222222222221%
Value, €/FPS
€2.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€206.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36573 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.55319148936171%
Multi-Core
2072
21.5407006965381%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |