Buy on Amazon
€1,295.31
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1897 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 540 vs 526 FPS
- Up to 97% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $29.24 vs $1166.95
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76777 minutes ago
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.