Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 525 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $39.15 vs $1166.95
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76980 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76981 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.42553191489362%
Multi-Core
1051
10.926291714315417%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |