Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2163 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 145 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 30% better in Valorant than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 978 vs 751 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $277.52 vs $1166.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing Valorant than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.31 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9495 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
978
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€308.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €308.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |