Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 2272 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 229 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $269.8 vs $1166.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77055 minutes ago
Buy for €299.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
41.607648725212464%
Multi-Core
9619
57.450874992534196%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |