Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 985 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $162.32 vs $292.47
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.32 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €324.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |