Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 541 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 239 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 89% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $131.61 vs $1166.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76811 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76813 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
94.80851063829788%
Multi-Core
5489
57.06414388190041%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |