Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 681 days older than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Athlon 200GE - 223 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 96% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $51.17 vs $1166.95
- Up to 96% better value when playing Fortnite than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.26 vs $5.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.81/FPS
4.475043029259897%
Price, €
€1295.31
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40028 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
219
98.20627802690582%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
75.65957446808511%
Multi-Core
1857
19.30554111654018%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |