Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3326 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 22% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 197 vs 162 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€607.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €607.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1024
33.021605933569816%
Multi-Core
7422
35.34285714285714%
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
135 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |