Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 129 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |