Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 55 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 16 | Cores | 16 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
