Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 146 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 105 vs 130 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€239.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €239.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |