Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2696 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 36 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2696 v3 - 204 vs 197 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |