Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 1581 days older than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 7 3750H - 247 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3750H - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 3750H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
