Buy on Amazon
€67.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2690 - 535 vs 508 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
535
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 4-Core Comet Lake Processor 3.70GHz 8GT/s 6MB LGA 1200 CPU Retail
Buy for €67.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.