Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v2 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v2 is 272 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Performs up to 77% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1620 - 83 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |