Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 1953 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 235 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 3500U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
