Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 23% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 95 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |