Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 150 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 13% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2687W - 213 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 28 vs 16 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€810.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €810.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59855 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
585
40.09595613433859%
Multi-Core
3400
31.675051239053474%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |