Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2687W - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 65 vs 150 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |