Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2687W outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2687W is 146 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Performs up to 2% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than FX-4100 - 127 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 95 vs 150 Watts
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2687W
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
