Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 661 vs 614 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
661
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |