Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 120 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 26% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 156 vs 124 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €315.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |