Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1938 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 24% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2680 - 196 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 20 vs 16 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€335.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €335.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |