Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2680 - 181 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 20 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |