Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 3325 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2680 - 117 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €154.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |