Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1486 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€608.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
980
76.92307692307693%
Multi-Core
6528
87.5771397907164%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |