Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1088 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 202 vs 197 FPS
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
100%
Multi-Core
5794
88.75612745098039%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
