Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 203 vs 164 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |