Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |