Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2673 v3 outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2673 v3 is 1338 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400S - 157 vs 155 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
155
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |