Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 227 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |