Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 127 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |