Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 3062 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
928
40.121054907047125%
Multi-Core
5910
65.48476454293629%
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
